AATMAJ vs NATCAPSUQ: Stock Comparison
NATCAPSUQ is the larger company by market capitalisation. AATMAJ shows a higher ROE, lower leverage and a higher ROCE, while NATCAPSUQ shows faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AATMAJ leads 8; NATCAPSUQ leads 1 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | AATMAJ | NATCAPSUQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Healthcare |
| Industry | — | Pharmaceuticals |
Price
| Metric | AATMAJ | NATCAPSUQ |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹216.18 |
| Day Change | — | 7.35% |
| Volume | — | 32,916 |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹296 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹136.36 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -26.97% |
Valuation
| Metric | AATMAJ | NATCAPSUQ |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹44 Cr | ₹177 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 0x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 0.69x |
| EPS | ₹0.32 | ₹-3.82 |
| Book Value | ₹22.49 | ₹225.45 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | AATMAJ | NATCAPSUQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 30% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 124.95% | 13.23% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 39.69% | -242.3% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AATMAJ | NATCAPSUQ |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.4% | -10.51% |
| ROCE | 2.86% | -4.87% |
| Net Margin | 0% | -13.17% |
| Operating Margin | 9.66% | -9.07% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.41x | 0.49x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AATMAJ | NATCAPSUQ |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 64.33%▲ 0.57 pp | 50.92%▼ 0.12 pp |
| FII Holding | 0% | 0% |
| DII Holding | 0% | 0% |
| Public Holding | 35.67%▼ 0.57 pp | 49.08%▲ 0.12 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AATMAJ and NATCAPSUQ.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.