AESTHETIK vs MADHAVIPL: Stock Comparison
MADHAV INFRA PROJECTS L is the larger company by market capitalisation. AESTHETIK shows a higher ROE, lower leverage and a higher ROCE, while MADHAV INFRA PROJECTS L shows a lower P/E and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AESTHETIK leads 4; MADHAVIPL leads 6 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | AESTHETIK | MADHAVIPL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹7.75 |
| Day Change | — | 0.13% |
| Volume | — | 48,790 |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹9.9 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹6.95 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -21.72% |
Valuation
| Metric | AESTHETIK | MADHAVIPL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹120 Cr | ₹211 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 25.52x | 8.22x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.01x | 0.94x |
| EPS | ₹3.51 | ₹0.23 |
| Book Value | ₹29.16 | ₹8.92 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | AESTHETIK | MADHAVIPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -20.14% | 54.09% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -15.27% | 39.69% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AESTHETIK | MADHAVIPL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.33% | 10.93% |
| ROCE | 11.56% | 10.14% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 5.41% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 11.96% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.29x | 0.54x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AESTHETIK | MADHAVIPL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 69.57% | 68.81% |
| FII Holding | 0% | — |
| DII Holding | 0.09% | 0.04%▲ 0.04 pp |
| Public Holding | 29.78%▼ 0.56 pp | 31.14%▼ 0.05 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AESTHETIK and MADHAV INFRA PROJECTS L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.