AGARWALFT vs ANTGRAPHIC: Stock Comparison
AGARWALFT is the larger company by market capitalisation. AGARWALFT shows a higher ROE and a higher ROCE, while ANTARCTICA shows faster revenue growth, lower leverage and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AGARWALFT leads 7; ANTGRAPHIC leads 3 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | AGARWALFT | ANTGRAPHIC |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Capital Goods |
| Industry | — | Packaging |
Price
| Metric | AGARWALFT | ANTGRAPHIC |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹0.71 |
| Day Change | — | 0% |
| Volume | — | 3.04 L |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹1.17 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹0.64 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -39.32% |
Valuation
| Metric | AGARWALFT | ANTGRAPHIC |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹19 Cr | ₹11 Cr |
| EPS | ₹2.03 | ₹0.04 |
| Book Value | ₹27.59 | ₹1.11 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | AGARWALFT | ANTGRAPHIC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 25.9% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -75% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 70.26% | -35.76% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 1.47% | -56.84% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AGARWALFT | ANTGRAPHIC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.36% | 7.11% |
| ROCE | 6.82% | 5.88% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 5.12% |
| Operating Margin | 5.59% | 2.47% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.82x | 0.54x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AGARWALFT | ANTGRAPHIC |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 57.55% | 0.96% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 0.46% |
| DII Holding | 0% | 0.21% |
| Public Holding | 42.45% | 98.34% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AGARWALFT and ANTARCTICA.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.