AISL vs EFCIL: Stock Comparison
EFC (I) is the larger company by market capitalisation. EFC (I) shows a higher ROE, faster revenue growth and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AISL leads 2; EFCIL leads 8 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | AISL | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Services |
| Industry | — | Diversified Commercial Services |
Price
| Metric | AISL | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹179.97 |
| Day Change | — | 0.73% |
| Volume | — | 27,779 |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹335.85 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹171.42 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -46.41% |
Valuation
| Metric | AISL | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹64 Cr | ₹2,648 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 10.04x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 3.27x |
| EPS | ₹-0.49 | ₹18.33 |
| Book Value | ₹71.41 | ₹58.86 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | AISL | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 38.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 5% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -5.9% | -65.16% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 34.19% | -82.66% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AISL | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.3% | 14.95% |
| ROCE | 6.04% | 15.82% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 20.42% |
| Operating Margin | 2.38% | 26.56% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.21x | 0.03x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AISL | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 74.98% | 56.08% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 1.26%▼ 0.89 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 8.88%▲ 1.41 pp |
| Public Holding | 25.02% | 33.79%▼ 0.51 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AISL and EFC (I).
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.