AMEYA vs KLBRENG-B: Stock Comparison
KILBURN ENGINEERING is the larger company by market capitalisation. AMEYA shows a higher ROE, lower leverage and a higher ROCE, while KILBURN ENGINEERING shows a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AMEYA leads 5; KLBRENG-B leads 3 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | AMEYA | KLBRENG-B |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹471 |
| Day Change | — | 2.37% |
| Volume | — | 93,229 |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹544.85 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹332.4 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -13.55% |
Valuation
| Metric | AMEYA | KLBRENG-B |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹107 Cr | ₹2,608 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 28.3x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 3.99x |
| EPS | ₹7.45 | ₹2.34 |
| Book Value | ₹44.01 | ₹116.8 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | AMEYA | KLBRENG-B |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 98.88% | 98.63% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 94.17% | 153.17% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AMEYA | KLBRENG-B |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.93% | 14.71% |
| ROCE | 20.28% | 14.49% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.05% | 24% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.01x | 0.12x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AMEYA | KLBRENG-B |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 72.45%▲ 0.16 pp | 44.53% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 1.13%▲ 0.03 pp |
| DII Holding | 4.05% | 7.64%▲ 0.16 pp |
| Public Holding | 23.5%▼ 0.16 pp | 46.7%▼ 0.19 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AMEYA and KILBURN ENGINEERING.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.