ANTGRAPHIC vs RPPL: Stock Comparison
RPPL is the larger company by market capitalisation. ANTARCTICA shows faster revenue growth and lower leverage, while RPPL shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ANTGRAPHIC leads 2; RPPL leads 6 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| Industry | Packaging | Packaging |
Price
| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹0.7 | ₹26.11 |
| Day Change | 2.94% | 1.16% |
| Volume | 3.02 L | 2.87 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹1.17 | ₹26.97 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹0.57 | ₹14.25 |
| Distance from 52W High | -40.17% | -3.19% |
Valuation
| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹11 Cr | ₹133 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 8.85x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 0x |
| EPS | ₹0.04 | ₹0.98 |
| Book Value | ₹1.11 | ₹24.32 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 25.9% | 1.7% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -75% | 73% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.4% | 9.17% |
| ROCE | 4.84% | 8.53% |
| Net Margin | 5.12% | 5.19% |
| Operating Margin | 2.47% | 10.1% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.54x | 0.57x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 0.96% | 44.22%▲ 0.25 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.46% | 0% |
| DII Holding | 0.21% | 1.08%▲ 1.08 pp |
| Public Holding | 98.34% | 54.69%▼ 1.34 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ANTARCTICA and RPPL.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.