BABAFP vs PKTEA: Stock Comparison
PKTEA is the larger company by market capitalisation. BABAFP shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin, while PKTEA shows faster revenue growth and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BABAFP leads 6; PKTEA leads 3 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BABAFP | PKTEA |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Fast Moving Consumer Goods |
| Industry | — | Tea & Coffee |
Price
| Metric | BABAFP | PKTEA |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹921.25 |
| Day Change | — | -1.68% |
| Volume | — | 2,604 |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹1,169 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹605 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -21.19% |
Valuation
| Metric | BABAFP | PKTEA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹37 Cr | ₹296 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 0x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 0x |
| EPS | ₹1.88 | ₹31.98 |
| Book Value | ₹37.89 | ₹1,452.01 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | BABAFP | PKTEA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 31.1% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | -69.89% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 315.18% | 248.4% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BABAFP | PKTEA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.63% | -1.48% |
| ROCE | 4.6% | 0.2% |
| Net Margin | 0% | -11.72% |
| Operating Margin | 2.92% | 1.71% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.47x | 0.1x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BABAFP | PKTEA |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 73.5% | 66.33% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 0% |
| DII Holding | 0% | 3.41% |
| Public Holding | 26.5% | 29.66% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BABAFP and PKTEA.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.