BLIL vs PINELABS: Stock Comparison
PINE LABS is the larger company by market capitalisation. BALMER LAWRIE INVSTS. L shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BLIL leads 11; PINELABS leads 0 of 12
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BLIL | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Financial Services |
| Industry | — | Financial Technology (Fintech) |
Price
| Metric | BLIL | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹72.11 | ₹162.32 |
| Day Change | -0.1% | 1.52% |
| Volume | 58,245 | 2.04 Cr |
| 52-Week High | ₹79.5 | ₹284 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹67 | ₹134.73 |
| Distance from 52W High | -9.3% | -42.85% |
Valuation
| Metric | BLIL | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,601 Cr | ₹18,808 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 8.93x | 144.01x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.11x | 3.11x |
| EPS | ₹2.05 | ₹0.38 |
| Book Value | ₹101.1 | ₹51.09 |
| Dividend Yield | 8.76% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | BLIL | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -34.3% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 29,420.21% | -27.4% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 4,290.11% | 123.1% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | BLIL | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 73.46% | 4.03% |
| ROCE | 74.58% | 6.19% |
| Net Margin | 10.18% | 3.03% |
| Operating Margin | 99.2% | 12.19% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0.05x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BLIL | PINELABS |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 59.67% | — |
| FII Holding | 0.95%▼ 0.11 pp | 9.49%▲ 4.69 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.03% | 24.82%▲ 13.01 pp |
| Public Holding | 39.34%▲ 0.1 pp | 65.69%▼ 17.7 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BALMER LAWRIE INVSTS. L and PINE LABS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.