C2C vs RPPL: Stock Comparison
C2C is the larger company by market capitalisation. C2C shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and lower leverage, while RPPL shows faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
C2C leads 7; RPPL leads 4 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | C2C | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Capital Goods |
| Industry | — | Packaging |
Price
| Metric | C2C | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹26.11 |
| Day Change | — | 1.16% |
| Volume | — | 2.87 L |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹26.97 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹14.25 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -3.19% |
Valuation
| Metric | C2C | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹346 Cr | ₹150 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 8.85x |
| P/B Ratio | 0x | 0x |
| EPS | ₹10.8 | ₹0.98 |
| Book Value | ₹139.36 | ₹24.32 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | C2C | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 1.7% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 73% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 120.35% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -22.51% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | C2C | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 47.89% | 9.17% |
| ROCE | 41.23% | 8.53% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 5.19% |
| Operating Margin | 44.99% | 10.1% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.19x | 0.57x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | C2C | RPPL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 36.98%▼ 4.31 pp | 44.22%▲ 0.25 pp |
| FII Holding | 3.18%▲ 1.24 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 0.1%▼ 1.77 pp | 1.08%▲ 1.08 pp |
| Public Holding | 59.75%▲ 4.85 pp | 54.69%▼ 1.34 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: C2C and RPPL.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.