C2C vs TINNARUBR: Stock Comparison
TINNA RUBBER AND INFR is the larger company by market capitalisation. C2C shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and lower leverage, while TINNA RUBBER AND INFR shows a higher dividend yield, faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
C2C leads 7; TINNARUBR leads 6 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | C2C | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Capital Goods |
| Industry | — | Rubber |
Price
| Metric | C2C | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹1,018.75 |
| Day Change | — | 1.8% |
| Volume | — | 22,220 |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹1,322 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹527.45 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -22.94% |
Valuation
| Metric | C2C | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹346 Cr | ₹1,847 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 29.25x |
| P/B Ratio | 0x | 6x |
| EPS | ₹10.8 | ₹11.16 |
| Book Value | ₹139.36 | ₹166.76 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.32% |
Growth
| Metric | C2C | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 21.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 36.4% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 120.35% | -3.41% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -22.51% | -2.21% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | C2C | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 47.89% | 17.59% |
| ROCE | 41.23% | 14.33% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 9.68% |
| Operating Margin | 44.99% | 15.24% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.19x | 0.4x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | C2C | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 36.98%▼ 4.31 pp | 67.22%▼ 0.36 pp |
| FII Holding | 3.18%▲ 1.24 pp | 0.48%▲ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.1%▼ 1.77 pp | 4.18%▼ 1.44 pp |
| Public Holding | 59.75%▲ 4.85 pp | 27.8%▲ 1.68 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: C2C and TINNA RUBBER AND INFR.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.