C2C vs VMSTMT: Stock Comparison
C2C is the larger company by market capitalisation. C2C shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and lower leverage, while VMS TMT shows a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
C2C leads 8; VMSTMT leads 2 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | C2C | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Capital Goods |
| Industry | — | Iron & Steel Products |
Price
| Metric | C2C | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹49.64 |
| Day Change | — | -1.31% |
| Volume | — | 1.34 L |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹78.5 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹33.5 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -36.76% |
Valuation
| Metric | C2C | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹346 Cr | ₹247 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 10.89x |
| P/B Ratio | 0x | 1x |
| EPS | ₹10.8 | ₹0.9 |
| Book Value | ₹139.36 | ₹45.97 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | C2C | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 120.35% | 2.76% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -22.51% | 95.1% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | C2C | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 47.89% | 4.02% |
| ROCE | 41.23% | 5.95% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 2.51% |
| Operating Margin | 44.99% | 3.92% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.19x | 1x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | C2C | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 36.98%▼ 4.31 pp | 67.18% |
| FII Holding | 3.18%▲ 1.24 pp | 2.04% |
| DII Holding | 0.1%▼ 1.77 pp | 2.84% |
| Public Holding | 59.75%▲ 4.85 pp | 27.94% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: C2C and VMS TMT.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.