CGRAPHICS vs SIKA: Stock Comparison
SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L is the larger company by market capitalisation. CGRAPHICS shows a lower P/E, while SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
CGRAPHICS leads 5; SIKA leads 6 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | CGRAPHICS | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹1,085 |
| Day Change | — | -0.02% |
| Volume | — | 17,625 |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹1,359.4 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹870.1 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -20.19% |
Valuation
| Metric | CGRAPHICS | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹334 Cr | ₹2,317 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 19.17x | 66.48x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.86x | 14.82x |
| EPS | ₹7.72 | ₹3.96 |
| Book Value | ₹51.68 | ₹73.37 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.33% |
Growth
| Metric | CGRAPHICS | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 123.5% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 40.34% | -0.86% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | CGRAPHICS | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.94% | 23.43% |
| ROCE | 11.5% | 24.08% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 17.25% |
| Operating Margin | 8.91% | 23.31% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.73x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | CGRAPHICS | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 68.07% | 71.72% |
| FII Holding | 0%▼ 0.58 pp | 3.25%▲ 0.04 pp |
| DII Holding | 1.07%▼ 0.01 pp | 0.04% |
| Public Holding | 30.86%▲ 0.6 pp | 24.99%▼ 0.03 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: CGRAPHICS and SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.