CIPLA vs ETERNAL: Stock Comparison
ETERNAL - ZOMATO is the larger company by market capitalisation. CIPLA shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield, while ETERNAL - ZOMATO shows faster revenue growth and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
CIPLA leads 9; ETERNAL leads 4 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | CIPLA | ETERNAL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Healthcare | Consumer Services |
| Industry | Pharmaceuticals | E-Retail/ E-Commerce |
Price
| Metric | CIPLA | ETERNAL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,301 | ₹323.45 |
| Day Change | -0.44% | 1.38% |
| Volume | 6.54 L | 1.3 Cr |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,673 | ₹368.45 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹1,165.7 | ₹212.6 |
| Distance from 52W High | -22.24% | -12.21% |
Valuation
| Metric | CIPLA | ETERNAL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1.05 L Cr | ₹3.12 L Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 31.23x | 718.56x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.06x | 10.07x |
| EPS | ₹9.77 | ₹0.1 |
| Book Value | ₹427.31 | ₹32.1 |
| Dividend Yield | 1% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | CIPLA | ETERNAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -2.1% | 196.5% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -54.6% | 375% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 40.21% | 503.49% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -8.89% | -84.27% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | CIPLA | ETERNAL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.19% | 1.18% |
| ROCE | 12.16% | 2% |
| Net Margin | 13.96% | 0.73% |
| Operating Margin | 18.74% | 1.85% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.01x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | CIPLA | ETERNAL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 9.17% | 4.61% |
| FII Holding | 20.21%▼ 2.35 pp | 29.08%▼ 3.53 pp |
| DII Holding | 34.63%▲ 2.66 pp | 39.32%▲ 3.33 pp |
| Public Holding | 15.94%▼ 0.31 pp | 26.99%▲ 0.32 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: CIPLA and ETERNAL - ZOMATO.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.