CMRGREEN vs PERMAGN: Stock Comparison
CMR GREEN TECHNOLOGIES L is the larger company by market capitalisation. CMR GREEN TECHNOLOGIES L shows a lower P/E, while PERMANENT MAGNETS shows a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
CMRGREEN leads 4; PERMAGN leads 2 of 9
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | CMRGREEN | PERMAGN |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹217.33 | ₹906.05 |
| Day Change | -1.2% | 0.38% |
| Volume | 1.31 L | 5,557 |
| 52-Week High | ₹268.96 | ₹929 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹205.25 | ₹784.05 |
| Distance from 52W High | -19.2% | -2.47% |
Valuation
| Metric | CMRGREEN | PERMAGN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹4,750 Cr | ₹780 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 22.36x | 62.83x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.1x | 4.96x |
| EPS | ₹2.8 | ₹4.43 |
| Book Value | ₹78.73 | ₹183.04 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.24% |
Growth
| Metric | CMRGREEN | PERMAGN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 32.06% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 3.33% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | CMRGREEN | PERMAGN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.3% | — |
| ROCE | 10.93% | — |
| Net Margin | 0% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.74% | — |
| Debt to Equity | 0.81x | — |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | CMRGREEN | PERMAGN |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 84% | 58.01% |
| FII Holding | 2.11%▲ 0.54 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 5.3%▼ 0.22 pp | 0.01% |
| Public Holding | 8.59%▼ 0.32 pp | 41.98% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: CMR GREEN TECHNOLOGIES L and PERMANENT MAGNETS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.