COCKERILL vs TINNARUBR: Stock Comparison
John Cockerill India Ltd is the larger company by market capitalisation. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd shows a lower P/E, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
COCKERILL leads 2; TINNARUBR leads 8 of 10
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | COCKERILL | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Capital Goods |
| Industry | — | Rubber |
Price
| Metric | COCKERILL | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹8,213.5 | ₹1,034.9 |
| Day Change | 4.84% | -1.19% |
| Volume | 16,054 | 28,760 |
| 52-Week High | ₹10,871.5 | ₹1,322 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹4,955 | ₹527.45 |
| Distance from 52W High | -24.45% | -21.72% |
Valuation
| Metric | COCKERILL | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹4,021 Cr | ₹1,862 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 344.36x | 30.67x |
| P/B Ratio | 19.37x | 6.3x |
| EPS | ₹-59.1 | ₹34.2 |
| Book Value | — | ₹167 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 0.36% |
Growth
| Metric | COCKERILL | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 21.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 36.4% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 56% | 19.9% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 332% | 75.2% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | COCKERILL | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 22.1% |
| ROCE | — | 22.3% |
| Net Margin | 2.88% | 9.68% |
| Operating Margin | -4.02% | 18.5% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0.43x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | COCKERILL | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 0.11% | 67.22%▼ 0.36 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.32%▲ 0.3 pp | 0.48%▲ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.11%▲ 0.11 pp | 4.18%▼ 1.44 pp |
| Public Holding | 29.12%▼ 0.42 pp | 27.8%▲ 1.68 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: John Cockerill India Ltd and Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.