CONSOFINVT vs PML: Stock Comparison
CONSOFINVT is the larger company by market capitalisation. CONSOFINVT shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin, while PAUL MERCHANTS shows faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
CONSOFINVT leads 6; PML leads 3 of 10
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | CONSOFINVT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Financial Services | — |
| Industry | Investment Company | — |
Price
| Metric | CONSOFINVT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹290.91 | ₹483.85 |
| Day Change | 4.66% | -1.66% |
| Volume | 85,070 | 99 |
| 52-Week High | ₹293.4 | ₹645 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹152 | ₹451.55 |
| Distance from 52W High | -0.85% | -24.98% |
Valuation
| Metric | CONSOFINVT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹861 Cr | ₹147 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0x | — |
| EPS | ₹4.02 | ₹2.8 |
| Book Value | ₹358.65 | ₹2,912.09 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | CONSOFINVT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -35.2% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -39.9% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -74.65% | -2.45% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -75.97% | -90.3% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | CONSOFINVT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.67% | 1.01% |
| ROCE | 4.67% | 1.67% |
| Net Margin | 399.3% | 12.96% |
| Operating Margin | 101.76% | 0.95% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0.01x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | CONSOFINVT | PML |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 74.89% | 74.65% |
| FII Holding | 2.69%▲ 0.11 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 0.02% | 0% |
| Public Holding | 22.4%▼ 0.11 pp | 25.35% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: CONSOFINVT and PAUL MERCHANTS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.