ETERNAL vs MAXHEALTH: Stock Comparison
ETERNAL - ZOMATO is the larger company by market capitalisation. ETERNAL - ZOMATO shows faster revenue growth and lower leverage, while MAX HEALTHCARE INS shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ETERNAL leads 4; MAXHEALTH leads 9 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ETERNAL | MAXHEALTH |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Consumer Services | Healthcare |
| Industry | E-Retail/ E-Commerce | Hospital |
Price
| Metric | ETERNAL | MAXHEALTH |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹323.45 | ₹883.8 |
| Day Change | 1.38% | 1.19% |
| Volume | 1.3 Cr | 53.77 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹368.45 | ₹1,221.9 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹212.6 | ₹870 |
| Distance from 52W High | -12.21% | -27.67% |
Valuation
| Metric | ETERNAL | MAXHEALTH |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹3.12 L Cr | ₹86,035 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 718.56x | 59.01x |
| P/B Ratio | 10.07x | 8.01x |
| EPS | ₹0.1 | ₹3.32 |
| Book Value | ₹32.1 | ₹110.42 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.23% |
Growth
| Metric | ETERNAL | MAXHEALTH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 196.5% | 12.2% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 375% | 7.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 503.49% | 10.42% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -84.27% | -5.63% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | ETERNAL | MAXHEALTH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.18% | 13.42% |
| ROCE | 2% | 12.13% |
| Net Margin | 0.73% | 17.23% |
| Operating Margin | 1.85% | 22.82% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0.32x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ETERNAL | MAXHEALTH |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 4.61% | 23.71% |
| FII Holding | 29.08%▼ 3.53 pp | 41.78%▼ 3.61 pp |
| DII Holding | 39.32%▲ 3.33 pp | 29.96%▲ 3.64 pp |
| Public Holding | 26.99%▲ 0.32 pp | 4.56%▼ 0.01 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ETERNAL - ZOMATO and MAX HEALTHCARE INS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.