GKWLIMITED vs MCL: Stock Comparison
GKW is the larger company by market capitalisation. GKW shows a lower P/E, while M TEK COPPER shows a higher ROE, faster revenue growth and a higher ROCE. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
GKWLIMITED leads 4; MCL leads 5 of 12
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | GKWLIMITED | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Investment Company | Investment Company |
Price
| Metric | GKWLIMITED | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,547.8 | ₹52.41 |
| Day Change | -0.72% | -2.13% |
| Volume | 1,540 | 22,977 |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,937.8 | ₹82.85 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹1,375 | ₹44.1 |
| Distance from 52W High | -20.13% | -36.74% |
Valuation
| Metric | GKWLIMITED | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹910 Cr | ₹142 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 30.84x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.35x | 3.29x |
| EPS | ₹18.07 | ₹0.39 |
| Book Value | ₹4,391.46 | ₹18.49 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | GKWLIMITED | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 102.1% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 69.8% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | GKWLIMITED | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -0.09% | 10.65% |
| ROCE | -0.27% | 8.58% |
| Net Margin | -7.19% | 3.15% |
| Operating Margin | 38.88% | 4.4% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0.83x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | GKWLIMITED | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 60.01% | 63.13%▼ 2.08 pp |
| FII Holding | 3.1% | 0.12%▲ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.47%▼ 0.55 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 21.43%▲ 0.55 pp | 36.75%▲ 1.96 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: GKW and M TEK COPPER.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.