INFOBEAN vs LATENTVIEW: Stock Comparison
LATENT VIEW ANALYTICS is the larger company by market capitalisation. INFOBEANS TECHNO. shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield, while LATENT VIEW ANALYTICS shows a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
INFOBEAN leads 7; LATENTVIEW leads 5 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | INFOBEAN | LATENTVIEW |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| Industry | Computers - Software & Consulting | Computers - Software & Consulting |
Price
| Metric | INFOBEAN | LATENTVIEW |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹155.56 | ₹260.15 |
| Day Change | -1.92% | 0.81% |
| Volume | 2.5 L | 4.85 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,030 | ₹517.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹120.33 | ₹248 |
| Distance from 52W High | -84.9% | -49.73% |
Valuation
| Metric | INFOBEAN | LATENTVIEW |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,508 Cr | ₹5,380 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 18.92x | 27.51x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.89x | 3.07x |
| EPS | ₹2.23 | ₹2.33 |
| Book Value | ₹42.65 | ₹86.21 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | INFOBEAN | LATENTVIEW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 37.4% | 19.4% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 105.5% | -1.1% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 34.65% | 176.81% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 38.68% | 34.86% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | INFOBEAN | LATENTVIEW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 20.96% | 11.33% |
| ROCE | 25.07% | 12.91% |
| Net Margin | 16.87% | 18.69% |
| Operating Margin | 22.15% | 25.57% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | INFOBEAN | LATENTVIEW |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 52.48%▼ 0.01 pp | 65.1% |
| FII Holding | 0.41%▼ 0.04 pp | 2.13%▼ 1.02 pp |
| DII Holding | 0%▼ 0.2 pp | 3.6%▼ 0.52 pp |
| Public Holding | 26.77%▲ 0.26 pp | 29.17%▲ 1.55 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: INFOBEANS TECHNO. and LATENT VIEW ANALYTICS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.