KAMAHOLD vs MCL: Stock Comparison
KAMA HOLDINGS is the larger company by market capitalisation. KAMA HOLDINGS shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield, while M TEK COPPER shows faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
KAMAHOLD leads 10; MCL leads 2 of 12
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | KAMAHOLD | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Financial Services |
| Industry | — | Investment Company |
Price
| Metric | KAMAHOLD | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹2,249 | ₹52.41 |
| Day Change | -0.39% | -2.13% |
| Volume | 1,255 | 22,977 |
| 52-Week High | ₹2,783.9 | ₹82.85 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹2,172.3 | ₹44.1 |
| Distance from 52W High | -19.21% | -36.74% |
Valuation
| Metric | KAMAHOLD | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹7,265 Cr | ₹142 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 6.64x | 30.84x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.91x | 3.29x |
| EPS | ₹119.56 | ₹0.39 |
| Book Value | ₹4,675.27 | ₹18.49 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.01% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | KAMAHOLD | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 102.1% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 69.8% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 8.87% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 30.39% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | KAMAHOLD | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.48% | 10.65% |
| ROCE | 15.45% | 8.58% |
| Net Margin | 11.58% | 3.15% |
| Operating Margin | 97.29% | 4.4% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0.83x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | KAMAHOLD | MCL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 75% | 63.13%▼ 2.08 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.24% | 0.12%▲ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.03% | 0% |
| Public Holding | 24.72% | 36.75%▲ 1.96 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: KAMA HOLDINGS and M TEK COPPER.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.