MMFL vs SUNCLAY: Stock Comparison
MM FORGINGS is the larger company by market capitalisation. MM FORGINGS shows a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth, while SUNDARAM CLAYTON shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
MMFL leads 4; SUNCLAY leads 9 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | MMFL | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Automobile and Auto Components | Automobile and Auto Components |
| Industry | Auto Components & Equipments | Auto Components & Equipments |
Price
| Metric | MMFL | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹630.1 | ₹1,304.4 |
| Day Change | -1.82% | 1.01% |
| Volume | 1.63 L | 3,165 |
| 52-Week High | ₹687.95 | ₹1,942 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹294.6 | ₹1,112.8 |
| Distance from 52W High | -8.41% | -32.83% |
Valuation
| Metric | MMFL | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹3,044 Cr | ₹2,861 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 18.53x | 11.22x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.21x | 2.17x |
| EPS | ₹18.73 | ₹-26.91 |
| Book Value | ₹202.59 | ₹587.59 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.62% | 0.35% |
Growth
| Metric | MMFL | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 15.9% | -10.5% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 34.1% | 184.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0.19% | 12.86% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -1.35% | -448.18% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | MMFL | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.03% | 19.48% |
| ROCE | 10.53% | 15.07% |
| Net Margin | 6.24% | 12.46% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 21.48% |
| Debt to Equity | 1.1x | 1x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | MMFL | SUNCLAY |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 56.34% | 59.09% |
| FII Holding | 2.44%▲ 0.58 pp | 0.88%▲ 0.45 pp |
| DII Holding | 7.49%▼ 0.88 pp | 20.71%▼ 0.37 pp |
| Public Holding | 33.73%▲ 0.29 pp | 19.32%▼ 0.08 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: MM FORGINGS and SUNDARAM CLAYTON.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.