PROSTARM vs TINNARUBR: Stock Comparison
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd is the larger company by market capitalisation. Prostarm Info Systems Limited shows a lower P/E, faster revenue growth and lower leverage, while Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and a higher ROCE. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
PROSTARM leads 5; TINNARUBR leads 8 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | PROSTARM | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| Industry | Other Electrical Equipment | Rubber |
Price
| Metric | PROSTARM | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹138.72 | ₹1,034.9 |
| Day Change | 0.14% | -1.19% |
| Volume | 1.98 L | 28,760 |
| 52-Week High | ₹237 | ₹1,322 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹114.64 | ₹527.45 |
| Distance from 52W High | -41.47% | -21.72% |
Valuation
| Metric | PROSTARM | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹812 Cr | ₹1,862 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 22.5x | 30.67x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.8x | 6.3x |
| EPS | ₹5.82 | ₹34.2 |
| Book Value | ₹48.7 | ₹167 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.36% |
Growth
| Metric | PROSTARM | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 27.4% | 21.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -12.3% | 36.4% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 27.4% | 19.9% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 17.1% | 75.2% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | PROSTARM | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.9% | 22.1% |
| ROCE | 17.8% | 22.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.54% | 9.68% |
| Operating Margin | 12% | 18.5% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.32x | 0.43x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | PROSTARM | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 72.83%▲ 0.01 pp | 67.22%▼ 0.36 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.51%▼ 0.35 pp | 0.48%▲ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.87%▲ 0.05 pp | 4.18%▼ 1.44 pp |
| Public Holding | 25.79%▲ 0.29 pp | 27.8%▲ 1.68 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: Prostarm Info Systems Limited and Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.