RHETAN vs TINNARUBR: Stock Comparison
Rhetan TMT Limited is the larger company by market capitalisation. Rhetan TMT Limited shows faster revenue growth, lower leverage and a higher net margin, while Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
RHETAN leads 6; TINNARUBR leads 7 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | RHETAN | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| Industry | Iron & Steel Products | Rubber |
Price
| Metric | RHETAN | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹24.22 | ₹1,034.9 |
| Day Change | 9.94% | -1.19% |
| Volume | 3.86 Cr | 28,760 |
| 52-Week High | ₹34.87 | ₹1,322 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹20.32 | ₹527.45 |
| Distance from 52W High | -30.54% | -21.72% |
Valuation
| Metric | RHETAN | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,932 Cr | ₹1,862 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 151.5x | 30.67x |
| P/B Ratio | 17.82x | 6.3x |
| EPS | ₹0.13 | ₹34.2 |
| Book Value | ₹3.92 | ₹167 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.36% |
Growth
| Metric | RHETAN | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 30.8% | 21.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 36.4% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 30.8% | 19.9% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 362% | 75.2% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | RHETAN | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.2% | 22.1% |
| ROCE | 10.9% | 22.3% |
| Net Margin | 42.13% | 9.68% |
| Operating Margin | 27.1% | 18.5% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.38x | 0.43x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | RHETAN | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 62.12% | 67.22%▼ 0.36 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.34%▼ 0.53 pp | 0.48%▲ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | — | 4.18%▼ 1.44 pp |
| Public Holding | 37.55%▲ 0.53 pp | 27.8%▲ 1.68 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: Rhetan TMT Limited and Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.