RMDRIP vs TINNARUBR: Stock Comparison
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd is the larger company by market capitalisation. R M Drip and Sprinklers Systems Limited shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and faster revenue growth, while Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd shows a higher dividend yield and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
RMDRIP leads 7; TINNARUBR leads 6 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | RMDRIP | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| Industry | Plastic Products - Industrial | Rubber |
Price
| Metric | RMDRIP | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹18.02 | ₹1,034.9 |
| Day Change | -3.38% | -1.19% |
| Volume | 37.49 L | 28,760 |
| 52-Week High | ₹807.45 | ₹1,322 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹14.81 | ₹527.45 |
| Distance from 52W High | -97.77% | -21.72% |
Valuation
| Metric | RMDRIP | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹785 Cr | ₹1,862 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 21.1x | 30.67x |
| P/B Ratio | 6.68x | 6.3x |
| EPS | ₹0.82 | ₹34.2 |
| Book Value | ₹4.44 | ₹167 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 0.36% |
Growth
| Metric | RMDRIP | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 26.7% | 21.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -2.4% | 36.4% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 26.7% | 19.9% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -2.63% | 75.2% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | RMDRIP | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 36.6% | 22.1% |
| ROCE | 36.9% | 22.3% |
| Net Margin | 17.78% | 9.68% |
| Operating Margin | 26.5% | 18.5% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.48x | 0.43x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | RMDRIP | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 21.06% | 67.22%▼ 0.36 pp |
| FII Holding | 4.24%▲ 0.39 pp | 0.48%▲ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.1% | 4.18%▼ 1.44 pp |
| Public Holding | 74.6%▼ 0.4 pp | 27.8%▲ 1.68 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: R M Drip and Sprinklers Systems Limited and Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.