SIKA vs UTLSOLAR: Stock Comparison
Fujiyama Power Systems Ltd is the larger company by market capitalisation. Sika Interplant Systems Ltd shows a higher dividend yield and a higher net margin, while Fujiyama Power Systems Ltd shows a lower P/E. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
SIKA leads 4; UTLSOLAR leads 4 of 10
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | SIKA | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,002.7 | ₹477.4 |
| Day Change | 0.29% | -0.02% |
| Volume | 22,844 | 3.22 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,359.4 | ₹494.25 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹870.1 | ₹172 |
| Distance from 52W High | -26.24% | -3.41% |
Valuation
| Metric | SIKA | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,126 Cr | ₹14,609 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 61.17x | 49.18x |
| P/B Ratio | 13.63x | 11.36x |
| EPS | ₹17.2 | ₹9.93 |
| Book Value | ₹73.4 | — |
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | SIKA | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -10.2% | 125% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -1.01% | 169% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | SIKA | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 26.1% | — |
| ROCE | 35.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.25% | 11.46% |
| Operating Margin | 21.4% | 18.5% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | — |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | SIKA | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 71.72% | 77.67%▼ 0.12 pp |
| FII Holding | 3.25%▲ 0.04 pp | 1.63%▼ 0.3 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.04% | 5.98%▲ 0.38 pp |
| Public Holding | 24.99%▼ 0.03 pp | 5.76%▲ 0.06 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: Sika Interplant Systems Ltd and Fujiyama Power Systems Ltd.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.

