TINNARUBR vs UTLSOLAR: Stock Comparison
Fujiyama Power Systems Ltd is the larger company by market capitalisation. Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd shows a lower P/E, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth, while Fujiyama Power Systems Ltd shows a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
TINNARUBR leads 6; UTLSOLAR leads 3 of 10
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | TINNARUBR | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | — |
| Industry | Rubber | — |
Price
| Metric | TINNARUBR | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹1,034.9 | ₹477.4 |
| Day Change | -1.19% | -0.02% |
| Volume | 28,760 | 3.22 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,322 | ₹494.25 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹527.45 | ₹172 |
| Distance from 52W High | -21.72% | -3.41% |
Valuation
| Metric | TINNARUBR | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,862 Cr | ₹14,609 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 30.67x | 49.18x |
| P/B Ratio | 6.3x | 11.36x |
| EPS | ₹34.2 | ₹9.93 |
| Book Value | ₹167 | — |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | TINNARUBR | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 21.6% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 36.4% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 19.9% | 125% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 75.2% | 169% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | TINNARUBR | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 22.1% | — |
| ROCE | 22.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.68% | 11.46% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 18.5% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.43x | — |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | TINNARUBR | UTLSOLAR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 67.22%▼ 0.36 pp | 77.67%▼ 0.12 pp |
| FII Holding | 0.48%▲ 0.12 pp | 1.63%▼ 0.3 pp |
| DII Holding | 4.18%▼ 1.44 pp | 5.98%▲ 0.38 pp |
| Public Holding | 27.8%▲ 1.68 pp | 5.76%▲ 0.06 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd and Fujiyama Power Systems Ltd.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.