TINNARUBR vs VMSTMT: Stock Comparison
TINNA RUBBER AND INFR is the larger company by market capitalisation. TINNA RUBBER AND INFR shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth, while VMS TMT shows a lower P/E. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
TINNARUBR leads 9; VMSTMT leads 2 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | TINNARUBR | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| Industry | Rubber | Iron & Steel Products |
Price
| Metric | TINNARUBR | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹901.95 | ₹45.35 |
| Day Change | -1.96% | -2.35% |
| Volume | 23,242 | 13,754 |
| 52-Week High | ₹1,322 | ₹76.39 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹527.45 | ₹33.5 |
| Distance from 52W High | -31.77% | -40.63% |
Valuation
| Metric | TINNARUBR | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,629 Cr | ₹226 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 26.41x | 10.89x |
| P/B Ratio | 5.42x | 1x |
| EPS | ₹11.42 | ₹0.9 |
| Book Value | ₹166.76 | ₹45.97 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | TINNARUBR | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 21.6% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 36.4% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | TINNARUBR | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.16% | 9.22% |
| ROCE | 14.82% | 8.89% |
| Net Margin | 9.68% | 2.51% |
| Operating Margin | 15.57% | 6.24% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.41x | 1x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | TINNARUBR | VMSTMT |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 67.22% | 67.18% |
| FII Holding | 0.99%▲ 0.51 pp | 2.06%▲ 0.02 pp |
| DII Holding | 3.09%▼ 1.09 pp | 2.83%▼ 0.01 pp |
| Public Holding | 28.38%▲ 0.58 pp | 27.92%▼ 0.02 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: TINNA RUBBER AND INFR and VMS TMT.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.