ACLGATI vs GICL: Stock Comparison
ACLGATI shows lower leverage, while GICL shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher ROCE. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ACLGATI leads 2; GICL leads 6 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ACLGATI | GICL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Services | — |
| Industry | Logistics Solution Provider | — |
Price
| Metric | ACLGATI | GICL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹66.05 | ₹24.33 |
| Day Change | 1.07% | -0.29% |
| Volume | 9.1 L | 2.19 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹67 | ₹43.93 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹61.25 | ₹15.61 |
| Distance from 52W High | -1.42% | -44.62% |
Valuation
| Metric | ACLGATI | GICL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | — |
| P/E Ratio | 71.05x | 0x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.2x | 0x |
| EPS | ₹0.08 | ₹0.17 |
| Book Value | ₹59.56 | ₹11.47 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | ACLGATI | GICL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | ACLGATI | GICL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.56% | 8.02% |
| ROCE | 2.62% | 7.63% |
| Net Margin | 0.79% | 6.66% |
| Operating Margin | 25.91% | 7.98% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 0.31x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2025 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ACLGATI | GICL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 46.08% | 63.96% |
| FII Holding | 2.06%▼ 0.09 pp | 0%▼ 0.01 pp |
| DII Holding | 2.98% | 0% |
| Public Holding | 48.89%▲ 0.1 pp | 36.04%▲ 0.01 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ACLGATI and GICL.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.