AEQUS vs SIKA: Stock Comparison
AEQUS is the larger company by market capitalisation. AEQUS shows a lower P/E, while SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AEQUS leads 2; SIKA leads 9 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | AEQUS | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹211.85 | ₹853.7 |
| Day Change | -2.84% | -2.5% |
| Volume | 7.9 L | 2,884 |
| 52-Week High | ₹294.7 | ₹1,359.4 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹113.3 | ₹814.1 |
| Distance from 52W High | -28.11% | -37.2% |
Valuation
| Metric | AEQUS | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹14,352 Cr | ₹1,811 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 53.52x |
| P/B Ratio | 10.51x | 11.93x |
| EPS | ₹-0.79 | ₹3.96 |
| Book Value | ₹22.15 | ₹73.37 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.4% |
Growth
| Metric | AEQUS | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 3.7% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 7.39% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AEQUS | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -7.63% | 23.53% |
| ROCE | 1.31% | 24.06% |
| Net Margin | -9.2% | 17.25% |
| Operating Margin | 1.69% | 23.31% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.27x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AEQUS | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 15.27% | 71.72% |
| FII Holding | 5.93%▲ 0.77 pp | 3.25%▲ 0.04 pp |
| DII Holding | 9.27%▲ 0.42 pp | 0.04% |
| Public Holding | 23.45%▼ 1.16 pp | 24.99%▼ 0.03 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AEQUS and SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.