AEROPLANE vs OSWALSEEDS: Stock Comparison
AMIR CHAND JAG KUM (E) L is the larger company by market capitalisation. AMIR CHAND JAG KUM (E) L shows a lower P/E, while SHREEOSWAL S AND CHE shows faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AEROPLANE leads 3; OSWALSEEDS leads 3 of 9
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | AEROPLANE | OSWALSEEDS |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Fast Moving Consumer Goods |
| Industry | — | Other Agricultural Products |
Price
| Metric | AEROPLANE | OSWALSEEDS |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹238.71 | ₹11.45 |
| Day Change | -1.56% | -0.09% |
| Volume | 7.16 L | 20,594 |
| 52-Week High | ₹244.82 | ₹20.28 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹170.05 | ₹9.66 |
| Distance from 52W High | -2.5% | -43.54% |
Valuation
| Metric | AEROPLANE | OSWALSEEDS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,468 Cr | ₹105 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 17.5x | 21.82x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.49x | 2.59x |
| EPS | ₹3.54 | ₹1.34 |
| Book Value | ₹89.24 | ₹5.58 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | AEROPLANE | OSWALSEEDS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 117% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 283.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AEROPLANE | OSWALSEEDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 14.15% |
| ROCE | — | 9.93% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 2.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.72% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 1.21x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AEROPLANE | OSWALSEEDS |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 78.78% | 66.63% |
| FII Holding | 1.12%▼ 0.77 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 3.77%▼ 2.58 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 16.32%▲ 3.34 pp | 33.37% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AMIR CHAND JAG KUM (E) L and SHREEOSWAL S AND CHE.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.