AEROPLANE vs PICCADIL: Stock Comparison
PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRI L is the larger company by market capitalisation. AMIR CHAND JAG KUM (E) L shows a lower P/E, while PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRI L shows faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AEROPLANE leads 3; PICCADIL leads 5 of 9
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | AEROPLANE | PICCADIL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Fast Moving Consumer Goods |
| Industry | — | Breweries & Distilleries |
Price
| Metric | AEROPLANE | PICCADIL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹199.86 | ₹585.6 |
| Day Change | -2.57% | -2.75% |
| Volume | 5.56 L | 87,435 |
| 52-Week High | ₹209.44 | ₹809.7 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹170.05 | ₹515 |
| Distance from 52W High | -4.57% | -27.68% |
Valuation
| Metric | AEROPLANE | PICCADIL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,044 Cr | ₹5,794 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 20.63x | 42.43x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.31x | 6.62x |
| EPS | ₹2.44 | ₹2.17 |
| Book Value | ₹89.24 | ₹91.41 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | AEROPLANE | PICCADIL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 40.9% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 2.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -14.61% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -31.02% | -1.68% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AEROPLANE | PICCADIL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 15.26% |
| ROCE | — | 11.11% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 13.36% |
| Operating Margin | — | 19.2% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0.59x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AEROPLANE | PICCADIL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 78.78% | 68.57% |
| FII Holding | 1.89%▼ 1.61 pp | 0.8%▲ 0.04 pp |
| DII Holding | 6.35%▼ 0.17 pp | 0.88%▲ 0.1 pp |
| Public Holding | 12.98%▲ 1.78 pp | 29.75%▼ 0.14 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AMIR CHAND JAG KUM (E) L and PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRI L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.