AEROPLANE vs VINCOFE: Stock Comparison
AMIR CHAND JAG KUM (E) L is the larger company by market capitalisation. AMIR CHAND JAG KUM (E) L shows a lower P/E, while VINTAGE COFFEE N BVRGS L shows a higher dividend yield, faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AEROPLANE leads 2; VINCOFE leads 5 of 9
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | AEROPLANE | VINCOFE |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Services |
| Industry | — | Trading & Distributors |
Price
| Metric | AEROPLANE | VINCOFE |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹238.71 | ₹159.95 |
| Day Change | -1.56% | -3.74% |
| Volume | 7.16 L | 13.01 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹244.82 | ₹191.35 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹170.05 | ₹120.24 |
| Distance from 52W High | -2.5% | -16.41% |
Valuation
| Metric | AEROPLANE | VINCOFE |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,468 Cr | ₹2,347 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 17.5x | 38.33x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.49x | 0x |
| EPS | ₹3.54 | ₹1.43 |
| Book Value | ₹89.24 | ₹39.07 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.09% |
Growth
| Metric | AEROPLANE | VINCOFE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 57.2% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 16.1% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AEROPLANE | VINCOFE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 12.68% |
| ROCE | — | 12.01% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 13.05% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.72% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0.22x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AEROPLANE | VINCOFE |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 78.78% | 21.8%▲ 0.43 pp |
| FII Holding | 1.12%▼ 0.77 pp | 4.6%▼ 0.78 pp |
| DII Holding | 3.77%▼ 2.58 pp | 10.68%▲ 1.09 pp |
| Public Holding | 16.32%▲ 3.34 pp | 49.72%▼ 0.66 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AMIR CHAND JAG KUM (E) L and VINTAGE COFFEE N BVRGS L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.