ALLTIME vs SHRINGARMS: Stock Comparison
SHRINGAR HOU OF MANGALS L is the larger company by market capitalisation. ALL TIME PLASTICS shows lower leverage and a higher net margin, while SHRINGAR HOU OF MANGALS L shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ALLTIME leads 5; SHRINGARMS leads 7 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ALLTIME | SHRINGARMS |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Consumer Durables | Consumer Durables |
| Industry | Houseware | Gems Jewellery And Watches |
Price
| Metric | ALLTIME | SHRINGARMS |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹208.4 | ₹210.67 |
| Day Change | 0.19% | -0.51% |
| Volume | 65,171 | 5.7 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹314.7 | ₹266.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹186 | ₹166 |
| Distance from 52W High | -33.78% | -20.95% |
Valuation
| Metric | ALLTIME | SHRINGARMS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,367 Cr | ₹2,015 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 39.27x | 16.82x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.2x | 3x |
| EPS | ₹1.79 | ₹3.53 |
| Book Value | ₹93.68 | ₹70.29 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | ALLTIME | SHRINGARMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -1.7% | 106.5% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -22.3% | 67.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0.39% | -24.4% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -1.19% | -0.01% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | ALLTIME | SHRINGARMS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.8% | 17.04% |
| ROCE | 7.68% | 14.59% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 4.51% |
| Operating Margin | 10.39% | 7.11% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.13x | 0.26x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ALLTIME | SHRINGARMS |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 70.15% | 74.8% |
| FII Holding | 2.98%▲ 0.05 pp | 2.93%▼ 2.85 pp |
| DII Holding | 10.35%▲ 0.06 pp | 2.73%▲ 1.2 pp |
| Public Holding | 16.52%▼ 0.11 pp | 19.54%▲ 1.65 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ALL TIME PLASTICS and SHRINGAR HOU OF MANGALS L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.