ANDREWYU vs EIFFL: Stock Comparison
ANDREW YULE & CO. shows a lower P/E, while EIFFL shows faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ANDREWYU leads 4; EIFFL leads 4 of 9
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ANDREWYU | EIFFL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Fast Moving Consumer Goods |
| Industry | — | Packaged Foods |
Price
| Metric | ANDREWYU | EIFFL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹26 | ₹356.54 |
| Day Change | -0.91% | 2.68% |
| Volume | 53,769 | 1.79 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹30.49 | ₹381.96 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹24.51 | ₹204.98 |
| Distance from 52W High | -14.73% | -6.66% |
Valuation
| Metric | ANDREWYU | EIFFL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | ₹683 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 126.7x |
| P/B Ratio | 4.02x | 8.4x |
| EPS | ₹-0.05 | ₹0.3 |
| Book Value | ₹6.65 | ₹31.07 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | ANDREWYU | EIFFL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 71.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 80.5% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | -39.92% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 88.88% | -84.09% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | ANDREWYU | EIFFL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 6.11% |
| ROCE | — | 6.38% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 3.27% |
| Operating Margin | — | 8.21% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0.62x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ANDREWYU | EIFFL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 89.25% | 73.5% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 0%▼ 0.05 pp |
| DII Holding | 2.21% | 2.06%▲ 0.03 pp |
| Public Holding | 8.55% | 24.44%▲ 0.02 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ANDREW YULE & CO. and EIFFL.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.