ANTGRAPHIC vs SPELS: Stock Comparison
SPELS is the larger company by market capitalisation. ANTARCTICA shows faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ANTGRAPHIC leads 3; SPELS leads 1 of 7
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | — |
| Industry | Packaging | — |
Price
| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹0.61 | ₹145.65 |
| Day Change | 0% | -0.65% |
| Volume | 20,932 | 22,324 |
| 52-Week High | ₹1.17 | ₹157 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹0.51 | ₹140.1 |
| Distance from 52W High | -47.86% | -7.23% |
Valuation
| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹9 Cr | ₹470 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 0x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 171.14x |
| EPS | ₹-0.02 | ₹-0.29 |
| Book Value | ₹1.03 | ₹0.66 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 25.9% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | -75% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.4% | — |
| ROCE | 4.84% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.12% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.47% | — |
| Debt to Equity | 0.54x | — |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ANTGRAPHIC | SPELS |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 0.96% | 3.2% |
| FII Holding | 0.46% | 0.02% |
| DII Holding | 0.21% | 0.02% |
| Public Holding | 98.34% | 40.79% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ANTARCTICA and SPELS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.