ASCOM vs MEDIASSIST: Stock Comparison
MEDI ASSIST HEALTH SER L is the larger company by market capitalisation. ASCOM shows a lower P/E, while MEDI ASSIST HEALTH SER L shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ASCOM leads 6; MEDIASSIST leads 6 of 12
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ASCOM | MEDIASSIST |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Financial Services |
| Industry | — | Insurance Distributors |
Price
| Metric | ASCOM | MEDIASSIST |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | — | ₹336.6 |
| Day Change | — | 3.62% |
| Volume | — | 7.58 L |
| 52-Week High | — | ₹575.55 |
| 52-Week Low | — | ₹293 |
| Distance from 52W High | — | -41.52% |
Valuation
| Metric | ASCOM | MEDIASSIST |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹244 Cr | ₹2,513 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 26.8x |
| P/B Ratio | 0x | 2.99x |
| EPS | ₹4.46 | ₹1.76 |
| Book Value | ₹46.96 | ₹114.11 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.62% |
Growth
| Metric | ASCOM | MEDIASSIST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 28.1% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 140.4% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 102.4% | -75.06% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 97.14% | -52.34% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | ASCOM | MEDIASSIST |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.5% | 10.62% |
| ROCE | 10.75% | 11.91% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 9.72% |
| Operating Margin | 57.49% | 33.4% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.04x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ASCOM | MEDIASSIST |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 74.85% | 4.61% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 25.42%▲ 1.1 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 47.24%▼ 1.95 pp |
| Public Holding | 25.15% | 22.74%▲ 0.85 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ASCOM and MEDI ASSIST HEALTH SER L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.