ASIANTNE vs EFCIL: Stock Comparison
EFC (I) is the larger company by market capitalisation. EFC (I) shows faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
ASIANTNE leads 2; EFCIL leads 4 of 7
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | ASIANTNE | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Services |
| Industry | — | Diversified Commercial Services |
Price
| Metric | ASIANTNE | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹8.77 | ₹165.12 |
| Day Change | 0% | 0.22% |
| Volume | 2,180 | 1.11 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹10.99 | ₹315 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹8.05 | ₹160.64 |
| Distance from 52W High | -20.2% | -47.58% |
Valuation
| Metric | ASIANTNE | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹23 Cr | ₹2,466 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 8.82x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 2.21x |
| EPS | ₹0.11 | ₹4.66 |
| Book Value | ₹28.26 | ₹55 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | ASIANTNE | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 38.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 5% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 28.16% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 536.57% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | ASIANTNE | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 7.5% |
| ROCE | — | 8% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 20.42% |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.52% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0.03x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | ASIANTNE | EFCIL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 59.42% | 56.08% |
| FII Holding | — | 1.02%▼ 0.24 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.06% | 9.64%▲ 0.76 pp |
| Public Holding | 40.52% | 33.26%▼ 0.53 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: ASIAN TEA & EXPORTS and EFC (I).
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.