AURIGROW vs TMCV: Stock Comparison
TATA MOTORS shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AURIGROW leads 0; TMCV leads 9 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | AURIGROW | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Capital Goods | — |
| Industry | Cables - Electricals | — |
Price
| Metric | AURIGROW | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹0.28 | ₹434.55 |
| Day Change | 0% | -1.07% |
| Volume | 1.95 Cr | 71.09 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹0.93 | ₹509 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹0.24 | ₹317.75 |
| Distance from 52W High | -69.89% | -14.63% |
Valuation
| Metric | AURIGROW | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | ₹1.6 L Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 38.17x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 12.56x |
| EPS | ₹-0.01 | ₹6.95 |
| Book Value | ₹0.67 | ₹34.58 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.92% |
Growth
| Metric | AURIGROW | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -100% | 6.92% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -19.6% | 67.28% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AURIGROW | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1.22% | 56.32% |
| ROCE | -0.45% | 67.49% |
| Net Margin | -7.88% | 3.61% |
| Operating Margin | -5.77% | 10.28% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.8x | 0.38x |
Shareholding
As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AURIGROW | TMCV |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 0% | 42.56% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 18.58%▼ 0.45 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 18.45%▲ 0.61 pp |
| Public Holding | 100% | 20.35%▼ 0.17 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AURIGROW and TATA MOTORS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.