AUSTENG vs COMSYN: Stock Comparison
COMMERCIAL SYN BAGS shows a higher dividend yield, faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
AUSTENG leads 4; COMSYN leads 3 of 7
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | AUSTENG | COMSYN |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Capital Goods |
| Industry | — | Packaging |
Price
| Metric | AUSTENG | COMSYN |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹135.29 | ₹299.15 |
| Day Change | 6.49% | 0.05% |
| Volume | 6,029 | 71,613 |
| 52-Week High | ₹139 | ₹314.85 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹110 | ₹147 |
| Distance from 52W High | -2.67% | -4.99% |
Valuation
| Metric | AUSTENG | COMSYN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹0 Cr | ₹1,200 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 40.53x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 6.82x |
| EPS | ₹2.7 | ₹2.21 |
| Book Value | ₹203.1 | ₹44 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.13% |
Growth
| Metric | AUSTENG | COMSYN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 2.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -25.2% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 3.46% | 0.76% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -6.41% | -7.73% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | AUSTENG | COMSYN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 15.51% |
| ROCE | — | 12.09% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 6.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.32% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0.63x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | AUSTENG | COMSYN |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 34.17% | 59.18% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 0%▼ 0.17 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.07% | 0.06%▼ 0.03 pp |
| Public Holding | 65.76% | 40.76%▲ 0.21 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: AUSTIN ENGINEERING CO. L and COMMERCIAL SYN BAGS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.