BAFNAPH vs DCAL: Stock Comparison
DISHMAN CARBO AMCIS is the larger company by market capitalisation. BAFNAPH shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher ROCE, while DISHMAN CARBO AMCIS shows faster revenue growth and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BAFNAPH leads 7; DCAL leads 3 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BAFNAPH | DCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Pharmaceuticals | Pharmaceuticals |
Price
| Metric | BAFNAPH | DCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹174.58 | ₹140.02 |
| Day Change | -10% | -1.46% |
| Volume | 2.84 L | 1.95 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹213.36 | ₹303 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹94.77 | ₹128.5 |
| Distance from 52W High | -18.18% | -53.79% |
Valuation
| Metric | BAFNAPH | DCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,086 Cr | ₹2,195 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 135.92x |
| P/B Ratio | 0x | 0.33x |
| EPS | ₹1.34 | ₹-3.69 |
| Book Value | ₹406.44 | ₹425.87 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | BAFNAPH | DCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 15.4% | 18.9% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 95% | -49.5% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BAFNAPH | DCAL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.54% | -0.99% |
| ROCE | 11.12% | 0.61% |
| Net Margin | 7.37% | 2.51% |
| Operating Margin | 9.71% | 11.78% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.39x | 0.16x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BAFNAPH | DCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 75% | 59.32% |
| FII Holding | 9.34% | 6.86%▼ 0.59 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 2.07%▲ 0.44 pp |
| Public Holding | 15.66% | 31.75%▲ 0.15 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BAFNAPH and DISHMAN CARBO AMCIS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.