BAFNAPH vs ZIMLAB: Stock Comparison
BAFNAPH is the larger company by market capitalisation. BAFNAPH shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BAFNAPH leads 10; ZIMLAB leads 2 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BAFNAPH | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Pharmaceuticals | Pharmaceuticals |
Price
| Metric | BAFNAPH | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹174.58 | ₹125.5 |
| Day Change | -10% | -1.97% |
| Volume | 2.84 L | 54,799 |
| 52-Week High | ₹213.36 | ₹136.9 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹94.77 | ₹59.31 |
| Distance from 52W High | -18.18% | -8.33% |
Valuation
| Metric | BAFNAPH | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹702 Cr | ₹672 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 150.79x |
| P/B Ratio | 0x | 2.07x |
| EPS | ₹0.03 | ₹-0.75 |
| Book Value | ₹40.64 | ₹55.31 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | BAFNAPH | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 15.4% | -3.36% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 95% | -47.01% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -82.35% | 1.21% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -99.32% | -3.65% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BAFNAPH | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.54% | 2.08% |
| ROCE | 11.12% | 3.93% |
| Net Margin | 7.37% | 1.56% |
| Operating Margin | 9.71% | 5.83% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.39x | 0.43x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BAFNAPH | ZIMLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 75% | 30.36%▲ 0.01 pp |
| FII Holding | 9.34% | 0.03%▲ 0.03 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 1.33%▲ 1.26 pp |
| Public Holding | 15.66% | 68.28%▼ 1.3 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BAFNAPH and ZIM LABORATORIES.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.