BIRLAPREC vs SIKA: Stock Comparison
SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L is the larger company by market capitalisation. BIRLAPREC shows a lower P/E, while SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BIRLAPREC leads 3; SIKA leads 8 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | BIRLAPREC | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹54.5 | ₹919 |
| Day Change | -6.23% | -2.63% |
| Volume | 4.63 L | 21,149 |
| 52-Week High | ₹61.4 | ₹1,359.4 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹32.25 | ₹870.1 |
| Distance from 52W High | -11.24% | -32.4% |
Valuation
| Metric | BIRLAPREC | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹356 Cr | ₹1,952 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 26.62x | 56.4x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.09x | 12.57x |
| EPS | ₹0.79 | ₹3.96 |
| Book Value | ₹25.58 | ₹73.37 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% | 0.37% |
Growth
| Metric | BIRLAPREC | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -8.66% | 3.7% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 140.61% | 7.39% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BIRLAPREC | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.44% | 23.4% |
| ROCE | 7.31% | 23.91% |
| Net Margin | 4.56% | 17.25% |
| Operating Margin | 8.52% | 23.34% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.3x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BIRLAPREC | SIKA |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 61.68% | 71.72% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 3.25%▲ 0.04 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.02% | 0.04% |
| Public Holding | 38.3% | 24.99%▼ 0.03 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BIRLAPREC and SIKA INTERPLANT SYSTEMS L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.