BLIL vs KAMAHOLD: Stock Comparison
KAMA HOLDINGS is the larger company by market capitalisation. BALMER LAWRIE INVSTS. L shows a higher dividend yield, while KAMA HOLDINGS shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BLIL leads 4; KAMAHOLD leads 7 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Price
| Metric | BLIL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹68.44 | ₹2,273.5 |
| Day Change | -1.03% | -0.5% |
| Volume | 1.89 L | 2,654 |
| 52-Week High | ₹79.5 | ₹2,783.9 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹67 | ₹2,280 |
| Distance from 52W High | -13.91% | -18.33% |
Valuation
| Metric | BLIL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,520 Cr | ₹7,285 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 8.86x | 6.66x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.1x | 0.91x |
| EPS | ₹0.07 | ₹-0.15 |
| Book Value | ₹101.1 | ₹4,675.27 |
| Dividend Yield | 12.56% | 2% |
Growth
| Metric | BLIL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -99.66% | -100% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -97.72% | -100.06% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BLIL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.38% | 15.48% |
| ROCE | 10.23% | 15.45% |
| Net Margin | 10.18% | 11.58% |
| Operating Margin | 12.13% | 97.29% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.03x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BLIL | KAMAHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 59.67% | 75% |
| FII Holding | 0.95%▼ 0.11 pp | 0.24% |
| DII Holding | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Public Holding | 39.34%▲ 0.1 pp | 24.72% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BALMER LAWRIE INVSTS. L and KAMA HOLDINGS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.