BLIL vs KAMAHOLD: Stock Comparison

Balmer Lawrie Investment Ltd vs Kama Holdings Ltd

Live data: 24 July 2026, 4:08 PM IST • Source: NSE and company filings

Kama Holdings Ltd is the larger company by market capitalisation. Balmer Lawrie Investment Ltd shows a lower P/E, a higher dividend yield and lower leverage, while Kama Holdings Ltd shows a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.

Side-by-side comparison of Balmer Lawrie Investment Ltd and Kama Holdings Ltd on live price, valuation, growth, profitability, leverage and quarterly shareholding. Highlighted values mark the more favourable of the two on that metric's usual reading; a single metric is never the full story.

On standard readings, BLIL is more favourable on 5 of 13 scored metrics and KAMAHOLD on 5These counts are context-free and are not an overall rating.

Key Differences

Market Cap
KAMAHOLD is the larger company
₹8,130 Cr vs ₹1,554 Cr
P/E Ratio
BLIL has a lower P/E
8.7x vs 8.83x
P/B Ratio
KAMAHOLD has a lower P/B
1.03x vs 1.08x
EPS
KAMAHOLD has higher earnings per share
₹290 vs ₹8.04
Dividend Yield
BLIL has a higher dividend yield
8.96% vs 1.62%
Qtr Sales Growth
BLIL has stronger quarterly sales growth
22.2% vs 7.07%
Qtr Profit Growth
KAMAHOLD has stronger quarterly profit growth
12.7% vs 12.2%
ROCE
BLIL has a higher ROCE
16.9% vs 14%

Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.

Price

MetricBLILKAMAHOLD
Live Price₹69.88₹2,527.9
Day Change-0.41%0.33%
Volume32,6192,037
52-Week High₹79.5₹2,750
52-Week Low₹67₹2,461
Distance from 52W High-12.1%-8.08%

Valuation

MetricBLILKAMAHOLD
Market Cap₹1,554 Cr₹8,130 Cr
P/E Ratio8.7x8.83x
P/B Ratio1.08x1.03x
EPS₹8.04₹290
Book Value₹64.8₹2,497
Dividend Yield8.96%1.62%

Growth

MetricBLILKAMAHOLD
Revenue Growth (TTM YoY)0%0%
EPS Growth (TTM YoY)0%0%
Qtr Sales Growth22.2%7.07%
Qtr Profit Growth12.2%12.7%

Profitability & Leverage

MetricBLILKAMAHOLD
ROE12.7%12.7%
ROCE16.9%14%
Net Margin10.18%11.58%
Operating Margin13.2%21.9%
Debt to Equity0.15x0.63x

Shareholding

As of Mar 2026 • change vs previous quarter
MetricBLILKAMAHOLD
Promoter Holding59.67%75%
FII Holding1.06%0.24% 0.05 pp
DII Holding0.03%0.03%
Public Holding39.24%24.72% 0.05 pp

How to Read This Comparison

Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.

Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: Balmer Lawrie Investment Ltd and Kama Holdings Ltd.

Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.