BLIL vs TATACAP: Stock Comparison
TATA CAPITAL is the larger company by market capitalisation. BALMER LAWRIE INVSTS. L shows a lower P/E, a higher ROE and a higher dividend yield, while TATA CAPITAL shows faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BLIL leads 8; TATACAP leads 4 of 12
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BLIL | TATACAP |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Financial Services |
| Industry | — | Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC) |
Price
| Metric | BLIL | TATACAP |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹62.5 | ₹317.05 |
| Day Change | 0.29% | -2.85% |
| Volume | 6,356 | 3.78 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹79.5 | ₹390.2 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹62 | ₹296 |
| Distance from 52W High | -21.38% | -18.75% |
Valuation
| Metric | BLIL | TATACAP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,391 Cr | ₹1.36 L Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 7.76x | 23.15x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.97x | 2.82x |
| EPS | ₹2.05 | ₹3.65 |
| Book Value | ₹101.1 | ₹110.97 |
| Dividend Yield | 6.87% | 0.18% |
Growth
| Metric | BLIL | TATACAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 7% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 52.2% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0.65% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -14.28% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | BLIL | TATACAP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 73.46% | 12.13% |
| ROCE | 74.99% | 9.81% |
| Net Margin | 10.18% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 99.2% | 69.91% |
| Debt to Equity | 0x | 2.5x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BLIL | TATACAP |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 59.67% | 85.41% |
| FII Holding | 0.95%▼ 0.11 pp | 5.06%▼ 0.12 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.03% | 3.88%▲ 0.32 pp |
| Public Holding | 39.34%▲ 0.1 pp | 5.01%▼ 0.18 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BALMER LAWRIE INVSTS. L and TATA CAPITAL.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.