BLUSPRING vs SHIVAUM: Stock Comparison
BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES is the larger company by market capitalisation. BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES shows a lower P/E, faster revenue growth and lower leverage, while SHIV AUM STEELS shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BLUSPRING leads 4; SHIVAUM leads 6 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Services | Services |
| Industry | Diversified Commercial Services | Trading & Distributors |
Price
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹156.12 | ₹554.35 |
| Day Change | -5.96% | 2.65% |
| Volume | 5.7 L | 98,365 |
| 52-Week High | ₹181.9 | ₹596.95 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹43.98 | ₹275 |
| Distance from 52W High | -14.17% | -7.14% |
Valuation
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,359 Cr | ₹748 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 107.18x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.17x | 6.38x |
| EPS | ₹-0.11 | ₹2.79 |
| Book Value | ₹49.48 | ₹88.84 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 7.9% | 6.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 108.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.93% | 14.5% |
| ROCE | 2.78% | 11.32% |
| Net Margin | -0.45% | 1.25% |
| Operating Margin | 1.04% | 4.82% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.04x | 0.78x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 23.89%▲ 0.37 pp | 73.53% |
| FII Holding | 5.28%▼ 0.42 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 8.62%▼ 0.03 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 27.69%▲ 0.08 pp | 26.47% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES and SHIV AUM STEELS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.