BLUSPRING vs SHIVAUM: Stock Comparison
BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES is the larger company by market capitalisation. BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES shows a lower P/E, faster revenue growth and lower leverage, while SHIV AUM STEELS shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BLUSPRING leads 5; SHIVAUM leads 7 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Services | Services |
| Industry | Diversified Commercial Services | Trading & Distributors |
Price
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹128.91 | ₹470 |
| Day Change | -1.95% | 0.99% |
| Volume | 1.2 L | 547 |
| 52-Week High | ₹139.8 | ₹483.9 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹43.98 | ₹275 |
| Distance from 52W High | -7.79% | -2.87% |
Valuation
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,931 Cr | ₹639 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 84.13x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.12x | 5.01x |
| EPS | ₹-0.74 | ₹2.79 |
| Book Value | ₹45.39 | ₹88.84 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 7.9% | 6.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 108.3% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 58.85% | 5.08% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -139.83% | 2.94% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.93% | 13.6% |
| ROCE | 2.72% | 10.84% |
| Net Margin | -0.45% | 1.25% |
| Operating Margin | 1.04% | 4.33% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.04x | 0.8x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BLUSPRING | SHIVAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 23.52%▼ 0.05 pp | 73.53% |
| FII Holding | 5.7%▼ 0.01 pp | 0% |
| DII Holding | 8.65%▼ 0.06 pp | 0% |
| Public Holding | 27.61%▲ 0.2 pp | 26.47% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES and SHIV AUM STEELS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.