BLUSPRING vs SICALLOG: Stock Comparison
BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES is the larger company by market capitalisation. BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES shows a lower P/E, faster revenue growth and lower leverage, while SICAL LOGISTICS shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BLUSPRING leads 4; SICALLOG leads 5 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Services | — |
| Industry | Diversified Commercial Services | — |
Price
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹156.12 | ₹76.27 |
| Day Change | -5.96% | -1.73% |
| Volume | 5.7 L | 34,430 |
| 52-Week High | ₹181.9 | ₹122.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹43.98 | ₹74.21 |
| Distance from 52W High | -14.17% | -37.74% |
Valuation
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹2,359 Cr | ₹599 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 17.31x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.17x | 4.72x |
| EPS | ₹-0.11 | ₹2.66 |
| Book Value | ₹49.48 | ₹33.79 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 7.9% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.93% | 18.28% |
| ROCE | 2.78% | 19.21% |
| Net Margin | -0.45% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.04% | 33.48% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.04x | 1.61x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 23.89%▲ 0.37 pp | 73.41%▼ 0.09 pp |
| FII Holding | 5.28%▼ 0.42 pp | 3.09% |
| DII Holding | 8.62%▼ 0.03 pp | 0.46%▲ 0.35 pp |
| Public Holding | 27.69%▲ 0.08 pp | 23.03%▼ 0.27 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES and SICAL LOGISTICS.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.