BLUSPRING vs SICALLOG: Stock Comparison
BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES is the larger company by market capitalisation. BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES shows a lower P/E, faster revenue growth and lower leverage, while SICALLOG shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BLUSPRING leads 5; SICALLOG leads 6 of 13
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Services | — |
| Industry | Diversified Commercial Services | — |
Price
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹128.91 | ₹112.53 |
| Day Change | -1.95% | -3.88% |
| Volume | 1.2 L | 1.52 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹139.8 | ₹122.5 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹43.98 | ₹85.61 |
| Distance from 52W High | -7.79% | -8.14% |
Valuation
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹1,931 Cr | ₹769 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0x | 22.05x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.12x | 6.01x |
| EPS | ₹-0.74 | ₹2.3 |
| Book Value | ₹45.39 | ₹33.79 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 7.9% | 0% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 58.85% | -46.39% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -139.83% | -13.61% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.93% | 25.04% |
| ROCE | 2.72% | 24% |
| Net Margin | -0.45% | 0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.04% | 61.36% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.04x | 1.85x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BLUSPRING | SICALLOG |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 23.52%▼ 0.05 pp | 73.5% |
| FII Holding | 5.7%▼ 0.01 pp | 3.09% |
| DII Holding | 8.65%▼ 0.06 pp | 0.11%▲ 0.03 pp |
| Public Holding | 27.61%▲ 0.2 pp | 23.3%▼ 0.03 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES and SICALLOG.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.