BONFIG vs TINNARUBR: Stock Comparison
BONFIGLIOLI TRANS is the larger company by market capitalisation. TINNA RUBBER AND INFR shows a higher dividend yield, faster revenue growth and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BONFIG leads 0; TINNARUBR leads 4 of 4
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BONFIG | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | — | Capital Goods |
| Industry | — | Rubber |
Price
| Metric | BONFIG | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹638 | ₹816 |
| Day Change | -0.11% | -1.18% |
| Volume | 4,149 | 23 |
| 52-Week High | ₹659 | ₹1,322 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹527.4 | ₹527.45 |
| Distance from 52W High | -3.19% | -38.28% |
Valuation
| Metric | BONFIG | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹11,978 Cr | ₹1,481 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 22.12x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 4.45x |
| EPS | — | ₹9.46 |
| Book Value | — | ₹166.76 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0.4% |
Growth
| Metric | BONFIG | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 21.6% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | 36.4% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | — | 0.26% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | — | -17.15% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BONFIG | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | 18.16% |
| ROCE | — | 14.61% |
| Net Margin | 0% | 9.68% |
| Operating Margin | — | 15.57% |
| Debt to Equity | — | 0.41x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BONFIG | TINNARUBR |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | — | 67.22% |
| FII Holding | — | 0.99%▲ 0.51 pp |
| DII Holding | — | 3.09%▼ 1.09 pp |
| Public Holding | — | 28.38%▲ 0.58 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BONFIGLIOLI TRANS and TINNA RUBBER AND INFR.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.