BVCL vs KAKATCEM: Stock Comparison
BARAK VALLEY CEM. is the larger company by market capitalisation. BARAK VALLEY CEM. shows a higher ROE, faster revenue growth and a higher ROCE, while KAKATIYA CEM SUGAR &IND L shows a higher dividend yield and lower leverage. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BVCL leads 8; KAKATCEM leads 3 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BVCL | KAKATCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Construction Materials | Construction Materials |
| Industry | Cement & Cement Products | Cement & Cement Products |
Price
| Metric | BVCL | KAKATCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹42.05 | ₹109.57 |
| Day Change | -3.2% | 0.14% |
| Volume | 26,950 | 1,851 |
| 52-Week High | ₹54.9 | ₹165.55 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹31.2 | ₹85 |
| Distance from 52W High | -23.41% | -33.81% |
Valuation
| Metric | BVCL | KAKATCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹93 Cr | ₹83 Cr |
| EPS | ₹1.36 | ₹-8.19 |
| Book Value | ₹56.56 | ₹235.02 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 2.79% |
Growth
| Metric | BVCL | KAKATCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 2.9% | -32.19% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 24.9% | 0% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | -1.1% | 21.1% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | -1.51% | -43.6% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BVCL | KAKATCEM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.27% | -13.17% |
| ROCE | 5.36% | -11.78% |
| Net Margin | 0.14% | -30.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.46% | -29.87% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.25x | 0.11x |
Shareholding
As of Jun 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BVCL | KAKATCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 52.72%▼ 1.4 pp | 54.25% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 0% |
| DII Holding | 0% | 0% |
| Public Holding | 47.28%▲ 1.4 pp | 45.75% |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BARAK VALLEY CEM. and KAKATIYA CEM SUGAR &IND L.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.