BVCL vs PRSMJOHNSN: Stock Comparison
PRISM JOHNSON is the larger company by market capitalisation. BARAK VALLEY CEM. shows faster revenue growth and lower leverage, while PRISM JOHNSON shows a higher ROE, a higher ROCE and a higher net margin. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
BVCL leads 2; PRSMJOHNSN leads 6 of 11
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | BVCL | PRSMJOHNSN |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Construction Materials | Construction Materials |
| Industry | Cement & Cement Products | Cement & Cement Products |
Price
| Metric | BVCL | PRSMJOHNSN |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹36.99 | ₹95.09 |
| Day Change | 1.43% | -1.68% |
| Volume | 920 | 36,024 |
| 52-Week High | ₹54.9 | ₹159.7 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹31.2 | ₹93.76 |
| Distance from 52W High | -32.62% | -40.46% |
Valuation
| Metric | BVCL | PRSMJOHNSN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹82 Cr | ₹4,777 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | — | 27.74x |
| P/B Ratio | — | 3.17x |
| EPS | ₹0.92 | ₹2.07 |
| Book Value | ₹56.94 | ₹36.57 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
Growth
| Metric | BVCL | PRSMJOHNSN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | 2.9% | -0.8% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 24.9% | 26% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 0% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | 0% |
Profitability & Leverage
| Metric | BVCL | PRSMJOHNSN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.23% | 5.73% |
| ROCE | 0.48% | 8.67% |
| Net Margin | 0.14% | 0.58% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 4.18% |
| Debt to Equity | 0.23x | 0.6x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | BVCL | PRSMJOHNSN |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 52.72% | 74.87% |
| FII Holding | 0% | 2.83%▲ 0.09 pp |
| DII Holding | 0% | 5.59%▼ 0.86 pp |
| Public Holding | 47.28% | 16.71%▲ 0.77 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: BARAK VALLEY CEM. and PRISM JOHNSON.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.