CIFL vs CRAMC: Stock Comparison
CANARA ROBECO AMC is the larger company by market capitalisation. CAPITAL INDIA FINANCE shows a lower P/E, while CANARA ROBECO AMC shows a higher ROE, a higher dividend yield and faster revenue growth. These are relative readings on individual metrics — weigh valuation against growth, margins, leverage and capital efficiency rather than treating any single number as decisive.
Metric snapshot
CIFL leads 4; CRAMC leads 8 of 12
Interactive comparison
Compare the numbers that shape the decision
Every row uses its own scale. Switch lenses to compare like with like.
Valuation lens
What price are you paying?
✓ marks the usual favourable reading; it is not a recommendation.
Key Differences
Each difference is a single, relative reading — StockeZee does not name an overall winner.
Profile
| Metric | CIFL | CRAMC |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC) | Asset Management Company |
Price
| Metric | CIFL | CRAMC |
|---|---|---|
| Live Price | ₹18.84 | ₹220.49 |
| Day Change | -1.15% | -2.76% |
| Volume | 30,800 | 1.7 L |
| 52-Week High | ₹39.69 | ₹353.4 |
| 52-Week Low | ₹18.56 | ₹214.2 |
| Distance from 52W High | -52.53% | -37.61% |
Valuation
| Metric | CIFL | CRAMC |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | ₹745 Cr | ₹4,403 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 19.25x | 25.01x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.11x | 5.27x |
| EPS | ₹-0.08 | ₹2.97 |
| Book Value | ₹17.66 | ₹37.4 |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 2.72% |
Growth
| Metric | CIFL | CRAMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (TTM YoY) | -7% | 2.9% |
| EPS Growth (TTM YoY) | 0% | -1% |
| Qtr Sales Growth | 0% | 4.64% |
| Qtr Profit Growth | 0% | -21.71% |
Profitability & Leverage
Debt-to-equity is shown for reference only — it is not a like-for-like metric for banks and financials.| Metric | CIFL | CRAMC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.65% | 27.33% |
| ROCE | 9.62% | 27.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.41% | 43.61% |
| Operating Margin | 23.87% | 65.09% |
| Debt to Equity | 1.27x | 0x |
Shareholding
As of Sep 2026 • change vs previous quarter| Metric | CIFL | CRAMC |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter Holding | 72.59% | 38% |
| FII Holding | 0.02% | 1.6%▲ 0.33 pp |
| DII Holding | 0.03% | 8.64%▼ 0.7 pp |
| Public Holding | 27.37%▲ 0.01 pp | 14.75%▲ 0.37 pp |
How to Read This Comparison
Valuation ratios (P/E, P/B) use the latest consolidated figures where available; growth numbers compare against the same period last year; shareholding percentages come from the most recent quarterly filings, with the change shown against the prior quarter. A "more favourable" highlight is relative between these two companies only — it is not a rating, a recommendation, or a comparison against the wider sector. Rows with no reported data for either company are hidden rather than shown empty.
Deep-dive each company on its stock page for quarterly results, technicals, filings and the full peer set: CAPITAL INDIA FINANCE and CANARA ROBECO AMC.
Related Comparisons
Data source: NSE and company filings via StockeZee. This comparison is informational — it is not investment advice, and StockeZee is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser.